On March 13th Time Healthland tweeted “The deadly dangers of eating red meat” which linked to their blog post “Eating Red, Processed Meat Raises Your Risk of Early Death.” A paper in Wyoming ran “Red Meat Kills.” Questionable science aside, these are, in my opinion, irresponsible headlines. Sending people running from a hamburger as if a cow is going to jump up off the plate and shoot you in the head is not going to improve anyone’s health. Really, folks.
By the next day my email boxed was full with concerns from panicked patients who I had put on a high protein diet based on their own individual risk profiles and health conditions. People were frightened, and for good reason. Death is a scary prospect for most, and when we are told what we are eating is going to kill us, we panic. The truth is that there are far worse things than a bit of grass fed red meat in our diets. But that’s another post.
This kind of dramatic reporting isn’t a rare occurrence. Just off the top of my head I can think of several examples of studies throwing us the final word on what is and isn’t healthy:
- Hormone replacement therapy. 1991 Prevents heart disease. 2008 Causes heart disease. 2010 Prevents heart disease.
- Antidepressants. 2009 They don’t work. 2012 They do work.
- Antibiotics for sinus infection. 1996 They work. 2012 They don’t work.
- Caffeine. 1978 Raises blood pressure, don’t drink it. 2011 Prevents heart disease in the elderly, drink it.
The only thing everyone can really agree on is that experts never agree on anything. And truthfully, most statisticians will tell you that results of studies are often massaged to get the answer that the researcher is looking for. Not to mention that studies may never be released if what was set out to be proven, isn’t.
That leaves the average person with the media (including social media) blasting sensationalist headlines often handing us yet another reason to beat ourselves up. What we thought was healthy, isn’t. What we thought was the right thing is the wrong thing. The two most common outcomes of this sensationalism are jumping on bandwagons or throwing our hands up in the air and saying “forget it, it’s impossible to make the right choice.” Extremes. And we all know that extremes are never a good answer.
So what is there to do?
- When you’re on twitter or facebook and see the headlines that put you in a panic about your health or your life, stop, take a deep breath, and take whatever it is with an initial grain of salt.
- Wait a few days to see how the medical community responds to the information. If you’re more holistically oriented, see how the alternative medical community responds to it. If you’re oriented toward Western medicine, watch sites like WebMD.
- Have a health practitioner who you trust who can talk to you about the actual numbers in the study and how they apply to you, personally. A health practitioner who can work with you not only to treat your medical problems, but prevent problems from occurring in the future. Understand fundamentally that the specifics of what you need are specific to you.
- Put your logic on. Association is not causation. In other words, just because two things happen together (eating red meat and slightly decreased life span) doesn’t mean one caused the other. If several times in a row your mother calls when you’re in the bathroom, it doesn’t mean that going to the bathroom makes your mother call. Or that your mother calling makes you go to the bathroom.
- Put the information in context. If there were one diet that worked to keep everyone healthy, trust me, we’d know about it.
- Remember, most importantly, that we don’t know more than we do know. There’s a universe out there of information we don’t yet know how to gather. The be all and end all today may not be the be all and end all tomorrow.
Dr. Samantha is a licensed naturopathic physician and acupuncturist, health educator, writer, cook and owner of Evergreen Natural Health Center in Portland, OR. These days when she’s not seeing patients she’s either playing with the fam or hanging out on her blog, twitter, facebook or pinterest. She’d love to see you there!
Monica says
April 6, 2012 at 5:58 amLMAO at the pic.
Dr. Samantha says
April 6, 2012 at 6:06 amImagine the look on my 5 year-old son’s face when he came home and found that on the kitchen counter. Priceless.
Coco says
April 6, 2012 at 6:01 amThanks for the dose of reason. I might take issue with your statement that if there were a one best diet we would know about it. I think we’d only know about if if someone figured out how to make money out of it. 🙂
misszippy1 says
April 6, 2012 at 6:45 amAmen! Now let’s spread this message far and wide to get all of America to calm down a bit when these headlines come out!
Howard says
April 6, 2012 at 7:29 amThe last post about not overexercising is the same idea as this one. Don’t sweat it!
Fab Kate says
April 6, 2012 at 8:38 amWhenever I see one of these headlines, I go back and look at the actual study and see what it REALLY says. The media is LOOKING for audience, not PROVIDING for audience. The days of fair and accurate reporting is LONG over. It’s about gaining the high viewership/readership that sells advertising.
You really have to go back to the research to see what it says, and often, who paid for it. Look for PEER REVIEWED RESEARCH from an academic source that is NOT funded by an interested party. The Dairy Association research will always come out with something that says milk is good, the Tobacco industry will fund research that miraculously says cigarettes aren’t as bad for you as we thought, and every car is rated #1 by standards set by their own manufacturers.
Even good research can be spun by the media to make some alarming claim that can increase the readership of the reporting agency. The more alarming the claim, the more people will read it, and the more people who read, the more advertisers compete to promote their product in that publication/website, leading to profit.
It’s not always about truth in media, it’s about money.
Dr. Samantha says
April 6, 2012 at 11:14 amYes! Exactly. And even the original study can be massaged to get a particular result.
Yoli says
April 6, 2012 at 9:30 amI tend to be very reactionary.
I can’t help it 🙂
Jody - Fit at 54 says
April 6, 2012 at 11:52 amGreat post! I do read & listen to a lot BUT I also am old enough to remember all the backtracks on studies from when I was younger. I take stock of what the study says, I think about it in relation to me AND how much I do or don’t do that “thing” in the study & then decide what is best for myself. If I stopped OR started doing everything that came out, man, I would never have a real life…
I think it all comes down to doing what we think is best for ourselves based on our own research.
messymimi says
April 6, 2012 at 2:10 pmJust right! Look at it, think about it, talk to others in the know, and remember we learn more each day.
Olive says
April 6, 2012 at 5:35 pmFantastic post, Dr Samantha.
Dr. Samantha says
April 7, 2012 at 6:40 pmThank you Olive!
Deborah (Schmiet) says
April 6, 2012 at 7:05 pmGreat post. I try not to believe everything I read… and like you say – IF there was some magic elixir we would ALL know about it! (And it would cost a fortune!)
Edith says
April 7, 2012 at 7:25 amI could use to be more balanced in how I apporach all of these studies, the news and information.
charlotte says
April 7, 2012 at 9:01 pmHahah – agree totally! And I love seeing those contradictory studies lined up like that. I swear I spend so much of my life trying to figure out what the research is saying now and how it relates to my life. Thanks for the reminder to chill.
cheryl says
April 8, 2012 at 7:01 pmDr. Samantha is an M.D. then. Right?
Dr Samantha says
April 9, 2012 at 1:55 pmHi Cheryl;
I’m an ND, actually. A licensed physician in Oregon, practicing primary care from a complementary medicine perspective. http://www.DrSamantha.com
🙂
parenting skills says
April 9, 2012 at 12:31 amI just eat red meat sparingly. I prefer chicken and fish meat for my regular meals.
Michael
Dennis says
April 12, 2012 at 2:37 pmSensationalism is what catches the eye, so people tend to use it much too often. I firmly believe that any food in moderation is okay.
Melany says
April 13, 2012 at 5:32 pmGreat post- good food for thought. I love dr. Samantha!
Clara says
April 25, 2012 at 1:29 pmInteresting^^